What you get vs $500-1000 attorney pre-filing search
Honest patentability
0-100 score against §101, §102, §103, §112. Most attorneys won't say "this isn't patentable" because they want the filing fee. AI doesn't care.
Prior art an examiner would cite
Up to 5 similar patents with patent numbers, what each covers, how yours differs, and the risk level for each.
Recommended claim structure
Independent claim 1 + dependent claims 2-5 designed to maximize likelihood of allowance. Strategic breadth, not the maximalist mistake DIY filers make.
Red flags called out
Alice §101 risk for software/business methods, on-sale bar, enablement gaps, prior disclosures. The traps DIY filers walk into.
Patentability score of 34/100 — saved me $5,500 in filing fees on an unpatentable claim.
The prior art list matched exactly what the USPTO examiner later cited. I amended claims before filing and got allowed.
Alice §101 risk flagged for my software method. Rewrote the claim around physical components. Allowed on first office action.
One-time pricing. Save $4,800+ vs. filing without a pre-search.
Starter
Patentability score and prior art candidates — the core due diligence before any filing decision.
- Full novelty + patentability analysis
- 5 prior-art candidates
- Red flags
30-day money-back guarantee
Full Patent Search
Complete pre-filing analysis: patentability score, prior art, recommended claim structure, filing strategy, and red flags.
- Full novelty + patentability analysis
- 5 prior-art candidates
- Recommended claim structure
- Filing strategy
- Red flags
- PDF report
- vs $500–$1,000 attorney search
30-day money-back guarantee